mpuser084
New Member
Was looking to continue adventuring out of the ordinary so I reached out to find if Ankita was working today (was told not, but according to the schedule she was), however I was told about Kajal (not on the schedule). I decided to make the trek out and I was not disappointed.
Now upon review of the photos, it looks like who I was with could have been Ankita, but without an actual face picture I won't know. The photo of Kajal is her, but the hair is different.
Room fee of $40 for 30.
Went for oilless massage as I have smooth skin. Which she had asked if I wanted an oil massage (I think she might have even asked for hot stone, not sure but a possibility), which I told her no oil required.
Massage was good, 7/10. Good pressure, some technique here and there but I could feel at times where it was just guestimating what was required. Didn't have a towel on, just left the boxers on, so I let her know she could remove them when she started to massage the legs and glutes. Shortly after that she grazed up on my balls and cheek asking what else I was looking for. Just wanted to feel her out price wise, wasn't looking to haggle or anything as this helps me determine if I am to repeat or not. Agreed on $100 tip for bbbj and it was well worth it. She gave a couple more tease grazes and then there was a quick BS which was good, then straight to business.
Here is the fun part, all this happened and I was wiped up probably within 15 minutes (according to their clock, which I didn't confirm if it was correct or not at the beginning). This tells me that the massage EDIT: (or tease) could have lasted a little longer, but needless to say after all this was done she asked what I was thinking so I jokingly said "what are we going to do with the remainder of the time". She resumed with providing a massage.
I enjoyed my time with her, felt genuine with our chat.
She has a nice chest, voluptuous and natural. She didn't remove the underwear though and my hands didn't explore beyond that. Possibly my problem for not asking or trying to give her a little rub.
I would repeat one day with Kajal, if not to see Ankita then at least. This may be sooner than later considering the location.
Now upon review of the photos, it looks like who I was with could have been Ankita, but without an actual face picture I won't know. The photo of Kajal is her, but the hair is different.
Room fee of $40 for 30.
Went for oilless massage as I have smooth skin. Which she had asked if I wanted an oil massage (I think she might have even asked for hot stone, not sure but a possibility), which I told her no oil required.
Massage was good, 7/10. Good pressure, some technique here and there but I could feel at times where it was just guestimating what was required. Didn't have a towel on, just left the boxers on, so I let her know she could remove them when she started to massage the legs and glutes. Shortly after that she grazed up on my balls and cheek asking what else I was looking for. Just wanted to feel her out price wise, wasn't looking to haggle or anything as this helps me determine if I am to repeat or not. Agreed on $100 tip for bbbj and it was well worth it. She gave a couple more tease grazes and then there was a quick BS which was good, then straight to business.
Here is the fun part, all this happened and I was wiped up probably within 15 minutes (according to their clock, which I didn't confirm if it was correct or not at the beginning). This tells me that the massage EDIT: (or tease) could have lasted a little longer, but needless to say after all this was done she asked what I was thinking so I jokingly said "what are we going to do with the remainder of the time". She resumed with providing a massage.
I enjoyed my time with her, felt genuine with our chat.
She has a nice chest, voluptuous and natural. She didn't remove the underwear though and my hands didn't explore beyond that. Possibly my problem for not asking or trying to give her a little rub.
I would repeat one day with Kajal, if not to see Ankita then at least. This may be sooner than later considering the location.
Last edited: