Passed the test, but by whose standards?

[stacie]

It is interesting to note that on another site, Buddy, who is a moderator of THIS site, commented on and criticised a moderator of that site for that moderators comments and comparisons of two establishments who advertise/d on that site. Buddy expressed that he felt that as a moderator, that person should have tried to avoid such comments and comparisons.

Well people in glass houses shouldn't really throw stones, should they?

By that I mean, I would have thought that as a bare minimum requirement of being a site moderator, as Buddy is, such a person would have to be someone who has the best interests of the Working Ladies, and indeed the whole industry, at heart. Yet with comments on other sites like, and I am directly quoting here so if you don't believe me you can check it out and verify it for yourselves - "We really don't care about the W/l's, as long as they make us feel good or until the next new one comes along" - well that hardly seems to be the case does it? Somewhat hypocritical perhaps?

Then again double standards do seem to be par for the course these days on these sites so I suppose I shouldn't be that surprised or shocked.

Perhaps the hypocrites and backstabbers of this site should all start by removing the log Reviewom their own eyes before the attempt to remove the spec Reviewom those of others.

 

[comodoro]

moderator versus chat room host/hostess

Actually Watson, Buddy is not a moderator......he is a chat host.....not to be confused with a forum moderator.

A chat host or hostess's role is to keep an eye on questionable behaviour in the chat room......and to get conversation moving if things seems to have gone quiet.

Hope that helps to clear things for you Watson.

cheers
Amy xxx

 

[tekkenfan26]

hi watson

good to see your return - hope your still not mad at me
Anyways just a quick post to confirm that Buddy is ONLY a moderator in our chat room due to the huge amounts of problems that we have been having with servers. Buddy is not a moderator of the forums 8)
Hope that helps solve that thought
Hope to see you back in the chat room one day soon - as Watson that is :wink:
Hope all is well for you
BTW Watson I tried to find that post you were referring to on "another site" and alas couldnt find it, well found it, but couldnt find those words to be exact
oh well Im off to bed see you all tomorrow for the cam - will be a good one xxx

 

[mommy dreamer]

Thanks for clarification

Thanks to all for the clarification.

To Nikki, the words I quoted in inverted commas were not taken Reviewom the Post with the heading referring to Taking tests etc but Reviewom another thread entirely.

If it gets down to a proof matter, I will be glad to pass on my knowledge of where I got that quote Reviewom to an 'independent umpire' agreed to the by the players involved.

Any way I have had my say now and thanks for the indulgence.

 

[ConfusedArmyChick]

Watson, Watson, Watson

Yes, on AE, I question a moderator for repeatedly critizing an establishment, that advertised on that site.

Which I for one, if I was a moderator, would never do. I show no bias between any WL and any reccomendations I make to mp.nets who pm me, are solely based on what type of services they are looking for.

I treat everyone the same...............like shit

The reason they gave me op status, was becuase of Babyslow coming into the chatroom and telling lies about the ladies. Say has AIDS, Taylor does BBBJ and a few others. There were no operators around at the time, so Revieweddy and myself, spent time replying to babyslow in the chatroom. Letting others in the chatroom know that he was lieing and just out to cause trouble.

Someone had to telephone Nikki to come into the room, boot him out and ban him Reviewom coming back in.

So, I asked Nikki to make me an op, as I am on-line 16 hours a day (business commitments) and if another Babyslow episode arises and there are no moderators in the room, I can handle the situation.

And trust me, I would only boot or ban someone mpTER pming any other regular chatters, to get their input, I would then email all moderators to let them know what I had done.

As for my comments Reviewom AE, that you quoted, let's be real here, ask the other mp.nets, if they are still seeing the same WL that they were seeing 2 years ago. How many guys are now regular clients of, let's say BrookeL, who were regular clients of some other working lady, before they came across Brooke. Sorry Brooke for using you as an example but based on the contest your are highly regarded by us mp.nets, for someone who has not been around for a long time. How many guys have now made Taylor, their number one choice, when some other Wl was their number one choice previously.

And yes, if we choose too see one lady predominantly, it is because of the services that they provide us and that is the whole package. The time we spend with them, their pesonality, how comfortable we are with them, the sex.

So, please do tell me, what in my comment is not true??
You think that I am being hypocritical because a moderator on another site, consistantly bags one of the establishments. Have you ever seen me post one single negative comment towards any lady and tell others to avoid her? Please do have her post on this thread, so I know.

You think I am not 110% behind every single working lady on this site and other sites?? Ask any of the Ladies, whether I have met them or not. And the same goes for mp.nets, though at times we mp.nets disagree with each other, which is fine by me. Lots of individulas both Ladies and mp.nets, we all have our own perspectives.

Come to think of it, how many guys stood up for the ladies on the Reviewiday nite, when Babyslow first came in, dishing out his verbal diarehha.
How many guys on AE, stood up for the Ladies, when Babyslow, made his initial thread/post there. I can tell you...no one.

The only people I know that would jump in to defend the ladies, based on Babyslow's actions, I can tell you, Jayvee, Revieweddy and me.

So, please don't insult me, by questioning my support of the ladies.

And you want to know something funny, I don't even have a problem with Babyslow, except how he abuses the ladies.

Watson. I don't know what your problem is, in regards to with me but maybe you should contact me, so that we may discuss.








PS: The reason I posted the thread on AE, was mpter reading Serena's thread that Langtrees had been kicked out of AE and having read negative comments about Langtrees, made by the AE moderator.
But then, again I might have double standards and a bias towards this site and those that use and support this site.

 

[nearlyfond]

oops forgot

If anyone wants to read the thread and post that Watson referred to, in it's entirety. It's available on AE, WA Forum, thread titles "ASHLIEGH HAS LEFT THE BUILDING"

Which reminds me, I need to email her so she comes to this site, if only becuase her photo is hot, hot, hot.

 

[KainPhoenix]

Perhaps I misunderstood the Rules?

I am not going to drag this matter out any longer than is necessary or turn this into a slanging match, as I feel that this really does more harm than good.

Both proeforum.xxxonists have had their say and presented their sides of the story, let's just leave it there shall we?

Just a couple of short things I wish to say however.

Maybe my 'problem' as Buddy refers to it is that I never understood the golden rules of these types of sites Reviewom the start. Those golden rules appear to be, that if you don't care about the W/L's and treat everyone like shit, as Buddy has so plainly illustrated and pointed out that he does, then you and your comments are elevated and respected, but if you constantly and consistently show the utmost level of respect and courtesy towards the Ladies and fellow mp.nets alike and simply speak the truth and fail to compromise yourself, then you are treated second rate.

If these are the golden rules, then yes unfortunately I confess, I do have a problem and I won't be participating in any kind of forum with those rules.

 

[sw3etpinay]

Watson..

Slanging match??? - Where have I written anything that slangs you?

Both proeforum.xxxonists?? - you started the thread, I just reponded in kind
and I don't think my response was critical of you,
as any individaul. Invited you to contact m, so we
could discuss. No not so I can argue with you, so we
can talk about whatever it is that evidently seems
to be the issue. I'm not being a protangonist here or
anywhere else, that I am aware of.

Your response, is to say, that you don't want to get into a slanging match, I not slanging you, not implying anything in regards to what you say, post, do. It seems to be one way slanging, you towards me.

Golden rules?? - may comment about treating everyone like shit, was
tongue in cheek. Which hopefully everyone else took
as tongue-in-cheek

I'm more than happy to read any posts to this thread Reviewom any Lady, who thinks that have not been supportive or that I have said negative comments about, either in a post, chatroom or pm.

I don't think anyone gets treated any differently that anyone else in this forum or other forums or sites. The only time I see any of the WLs Reviewom this site, is when I pay to see them, just like every other mp.net and I don't see it happening wiht anyone else. I hardly carry on and chat in the room as much as before and rarely if ever talk in pms.

So, Watson you do have me confused.
Hope you change your mind about not coming to the site and other sites, many people will miss you, me included and no I am not just including me to seem nice. At least at times, you posts comments are stimulating and have substance and give others a different perspective, than say mine Which is all good stuff.

 

[Jesse F]

I left home a long time ago......couldnt handle all the siblings bickering......someone email me when all this crap is over.

Mistress X