First time BBFS and Early Retirement.

[big.sleeze]

I'll take yung goose's word over big sleaze any day. No way Sierra did bbfs.

Noone believed Pure’s golden girl Katie would do bbfs either. Stay in denial. I’m sure theres others on this board who have barebacked Sierra already. Just a matter of when one of them will decide to speak up like yung-goose has.

 

[imyourpuppet]

Noone believed Pure’s golden girl Katie would do bbfs either. Stay in denial. I’m sure theres others on this board who have barebacked Sierra already. Just a matter of when one of them will decide to speak up like yung-goose has.

Been with both. Can believe Katie did (for the right price). Don't believe Sierra did. Not even 1% do I believe it.

 

[ralphie]

Been with both. Can believe Katie did (for the right price). Don't believe Sierra did. Not even 1% do I believe it.

i don't believe half the shit that comes out of Big Sleaze posts, but I can assure you that it is way higher than 1%

 

[OppaiLover]

i don't believe half the shit that comes out of Big Sleaze posts, but I can assure you that it is way hiher than 1%

I think imyourpuppet was referring to Sierra doing bbfs as less than 1%. As far as big sleeze and his bbfs collection of girls, I'd say about 50% is legit. It has become prevalent in the industry now as some girls honestly don't care anymore and will do anything to keep clients coming back.

 

[yung-goose]

It is very simple: he is saying some offer it based on rumors. As you and I both know, people lie (based on whatever agenda).

For ones where he is certain, totally agree. To then go and say it is plausible from so many he he has seen based on rumours just seems like a guy who has lost control. Maybe whatever disease he picked up has already hit his brain.

At this point, I guess we wait for the inevitable STD outbreak.

Are you familiar with statistics? If not here's a quick lesson.

A population consists of the entirety of a group. In our case, the population are made up of MPA's. All of them.

It is too time constraining and expensive to sample the entire population (known as a census). Where I would literally have to see every MPA there is. Therefore we take samples.

My sample size is 33. There are 34 MPA's listed but I've commented on 33. Sample's are used to calculate statistics. The following statistics correspond to my sample.

4/33 (12%) - Confirmed (confirmed for myself )
8/33 (24%) - Highly unlikely (cant say for sure they don't but this is as close as it gets)
13/33 (40%) - Unsure (insufficient information - no bases for an opinion)
6/33 (18%) - Plausible (clear hints and comments were made to ME that its possibly an option but members i trust cannot confirm)
1/33 (3%) - Highly Likely (clear hints and comments were made to ME plus trusted members have confirmed)
1/33 (3%) - Unlikely

Now these statistics are used to estimate parameters (key word there is estimate) about the entire population. So you can say roughly 24% of the population (MPA's) are highly unlikely to provide BBFS. Now it's dumb to assume that is true because of sampling variability also known as sampling error. Different samples from the population will provide different statistics. For example, what if my sample size was 4 and it just happened to be the 4 MPA's that BBFS was confirmed? Would it be then be smart to say 100% of MPA's provide BBFS? Hell NO. However sampling variability is actually a good thing - if samples provide similar statistics that means the population is similar. Meaning if 5 other samples were drawn of similar size and yielded similar statistics - you can be much more confident in making estimations of the population. If the samples provide different stats, than population is varied and it would be ill advised to go off the samples. So if there are volunteers who'd like to go forth and make the effort to do research (very fun research) and provide data y'all can have better overall estimations.

I get nothing out of "scorching" any of these MPA's. They have been lovely to me. And I made it clear in previous comments that I try my best to walk the fine line of leaving insightful reviews. But here's the thing, a lot of guys out there are clueless, if you could see my inbox you'd be shocked. And frankly they ain't got the money to blow so I try my best to help them out without giving every little detail. It's those guys I'm trying to help. The ones out there doing DATY with their favourite MPA when she just did BBFS with the guy before them. Don't get me wrong I'm super appreciative of these MPA's and feel for them man I really do but at the end of the day it's bros before hoes.

 

[Dinorawr21]

@yung-goose Thank you for all of the info and your awesome reviews. It's good to take a step back from this hobby for yourself and take whatever time you need for you.

 

[OG_funguy]

Are you familiar with statistics? If not here's a quick lesson.

A population consists of the entirety of a group. In our case, the population are made up of MPA's. All of them.

It is too time constraining and expensive to sample the entire population (known as a census). Where I would literally have to see every MPA there is. Therefore we take samples.

My sample size is 33. There are 34 MPA's listed but I've commented on 33. Sample's are used to calculate statistics. The following statistics correspond to my sample.

4/33 (12%) - Confirmed (confirmed for myself )
8/33 (24%) - Highly unlikely (cant say for sure they don't but this is as close as it gets)
13/33 (40%) - Unsure (insufficient information - no bases for an opinion)
6/33 (18%) - Plausible (clear hints and comments were made to ME that its possibly an option but members i trust cannot confirm)
1/33 (3%) - Highly Likely (clear hints and comments were made to ME plus trusted members have confirmed)
1/33 (3%) - Unlikely

Now these statistics are used to estimate parameters (key word there is estimate) about the entire population. So you can say roughly 24% of the population (MPA's) are highly unlikely to provide BBFS. Now it's dumb to assume that is true because of sampling variability also known as sampling error. Different samples from the population will provide different statistics. For example, what if my sample size was 4 and it just happened to be the 4 MPA's that BBFS was confirmed? Would it be then be smart to say 100% of MPA's provide BBFS? Hell NO. However sampling variability is actually a good thing - if samples provide similar statistics that means the population is similar. Meaning if 5 other samples were drawn of similar size and yielded similar statistics - you can be much more confident in making estimations of the population. If the samples provide different stats, than population is varied and it would be ill advised to go off the samples. So if there are volunteers who'd like to go forth and make the effort to do research (very fun research) and provide data y'all can have better overall estimations.

I get nothing out of "scorching" any of these MPA's. They have been lovely to me. And I made it clear in previous comments that I try my best to walk the fine line of leaving insightful reviews. But here's the thing, a lot of guys out there are clueless, if you could see my inbox you'd be shocked. And frankly they ain't got the money to blow so I try my best to help them out without giving every little detail. It's those guys I'm trying to help. The ones out there doing DATY with their favourite MPA when she just did BBFS with the guy before them. Don't get me wrong I'm super appreciative of these MPA's and feel for them man I really do but at the end of the day it's bros before hoes.

The problem with your statistics/estimation lesson is you are grouping "all MPAs" as the population. Yet your experience is based on a certain category of MPAs, i.e. basically sex providers. You cannot draw representative MPA bbfs estimates with your logic. That's like trying to estimate the average height of the entire male population but only taking samples from Africa.

 

[snoopdoggie]

Bbfs is very common. Don’t know why everyone calls bullshit when I out these bitches. Believe what you want. Use the info as you desire. If you are craving bare pussy from a young hottie there are many options out there in at spas and agencies. What I listed is just a small sample of what is available. Seduction just happens to be a bbfs haven right now. Management encourages it. I sugar daddied one of the girls there who may or may not still be there. She told me when she interviewed for the job they straight up asked her if she does bareback.

In all due respect, Younggoose said he had bbfs with only one girl. All the others he listed he was either unsure about, or does not offer at all. Even with the one girl he had it with, he said he pulled out right away. But you, Mr. BigSleezr make it sound like you're getting it from all the girls. There's a big difference.

 

[yung-goose]

The problem with your statistics/estimation lesson is you are grouping "all MPAs" as the population. Yet your experience is based on a certain category of MPAs, i.e. basically sex providers. You cannot draw representative MPA bbfs estimates with your logic. That's like trying to estimate the average height of the entire male population but only taking samples from Africa.

Ahh yes you believe a sampling bias is present. You make a valid point. I've never been to semi-legit, holistic spas and asian spas so those MPA's didn't even cross my mind. If we were to change the Population to the spa's I visited (SRM, Seduction, Premier and Flirt) that would suffice I believe?

 

[big.sleeze]

In all due respect, Younggoose said he had bbfs with only one girl. All the others he listed he was either unsure about, or does not offer at all. Even with the one girl he had it with, he said he pulled out right away. But you, Mr. BigSleezr make it sound like you're getting it from all the girls. There's a big difference.

Not all. Just the sluttier ones who offer it. I do come across alot of bitches especially the newer ones who will offer nothing but a cbj. I actively seek out bbfs and have been doing so for years. There is also a forum dedicated to bbfs that helps find new talent. The extent of names on that forum would be eye opening for alot of you. Yung-goose did not actively seek bbfs. If he had seeked it, he would have gotten bbfs from a bunch of hotties also since he has been at this for a long time also. There are quite a few bbfs providers on his list

 

[LazyBoy]

You keep talking about a bbfs forum. What's the forum so that we can see for ourselves? And if you say SP411, then whatever credibility you had went out the window.

 

[yung-goose]

Not all. Just the sluttier ones who offer it. I do come across alot of bitches especially the newer ones who will offer nothing but a cbj. I actively seek out bbfs and have been doing so for years. There is also a forum dedicated to bbfs that helps find new talent. The extent of names on that forum would be eye opening for alot of you. Yung-goose did not actively seek bbfs. If he had seeked it, he would have gotten bbfs from a bunch of hotties also since he has been at this for a long time also. There are quite a few bbfs providers on his list

He is right, that forum exists...came across it a while ago, shock to my system. And yea never seeked BBFS, opposite actually - had to remind the MPA on a couple occasions to grab a condom during the transition from BBBJ to FS. Thats why I said some are plausible.

 

[big.sleeze]

You keep talking about a bbfs forum. What's the forum so that we can see for ourselves? And if you say SP411, then whatever credibility you had went out the window.

Torontobbfs.cc

 

[LazyBoy]

Ok, I checked it out. It was NOT at all what I expected. For one thing, it is very civil and almost genteel. Kinda like the more respected contributers here except they were all talking about bbfs. I don't have access beyond the guest access yet so I'll have to see how the deeper sections are. So far, no trolls. Maybe it's cause it's moderated?

 

[yung-goose]

Ok, I checked it out. It was NOT at all what I expected. For one thing, it is very civil and almost genteel. Kinda like the more respected contributers here except they were all talking about bbfs. I don't have access beyond the guest access yet so I'll have to see how the deeper sections are. So far, no trolls. Maybe it's cause it's moderated?

I looked over it again, saw a couple members on here using the same username LOL and its not big.sleeze

 

[OG_funguy]

Ahh yes you believe a sampling bias is present. You make a valid point. I've never been to semi-legit, holistic spas and asian spas so those MPA's didn't even cross my mind. If we were to change the Population to the spa's I visited (SRM, Seduction, Premier and Flirt) that would suffice I believe?

Instead of retiring completely, you should give semi's a try. The ladies are not as hot so you won't be tempted by bbfs or daty. Instead you'll get a nice, relaxing massage with happy ending. You'll save lots of money too...

 

[ralphie]

I could buy that 25% of Premier/Sedutction girls provide bbfs. I have no idea what it would be at the lower end or speicalized spas.

 

[Gayboy]

Noone believed Pure’s golden girl Katie would do bbfs either. Stay in denial. I’m sure theres others on this board who have barebacked Sierra already. Just a matter of when one of them will decide to speak up like yung-goose has.

Thank you for letting me know about these ladies, I booked Katie and I'm ready to cip

 

[AnassRhamar]

Thank you for letting me know about these ladies, I booked Katie and I'm ready to cip

she not on schedule

 

[Gayboy]

She's back next week Thursday.