An MPA can make the $300 pretty quick, so I doubt that's what holds her back. But, idk, you might be right? Never thought of it that way.
Not sure if you ran your message through google translate or something
but after I finally made sense of parts of it...yes, you DO make a good point. It is illegal to employ or to work without a license. In that sense, it lacks legitimacy. I guess what I meant was, 'legitimate' as a rationale by the spa or the girl - such as just a trial to the spa, the industry, or passing through short term. But, you're right, even if they justify their decision, it's still illegal.
I think there are a few other transactions taking place by most of us in the room that aren't entirely legal or 'legitimate'. Either way, my point was that it's unfair to assume immigration, failing a health test, or a criminal past are the only reasons for no license, and unfair to target a specific chain for an industry wide practice.