imthedude
Known Reviewer
His posts are about the spas as a whole and my experience has proved he's more right than not. Bad dishonest MPAs are in a way bigger number there than good MPAs (I would still maybe give 80% to 20% ratio based on my experience). So given this (as well as the sketchy nature of this industry as a whole), is not it correct to be cautious and consider every MPA in those spas bad by default unless she has proved otherwise?
I would say this is a useful heuristic and it's nice to have a reminder once in awhile, but it's not such a useful idea that it needs someone to create dozens of accounts to repeat the same thing ad nauseam and to throw a hissy fit when it's pointed out. I know a lot of the posters here are also deeply upset that women have autonomy and that nonwhites exist at all, and I guess for them, the posts where he cries about that shit are useful, but it's honestly a pretty reasonable baseline to expect someone to post an honest review once in awhile; it doesn't even need to be a post of its own. He's been here two years and has opined this way about one girl, Helena. That week where he was pathological about Olivia doesn't count.